jim_newell
-
@ I do like the ones where they complain about why the rich GOP trustees aren't doing enough to change things.
11:47 PM Sep 3rd
via web
in reply to SailRabbits
-
Why it's a delightful new comedy website:
10:10 PM Sep 3rd
via web
-
@ oh yes, that link!
8:40 AM Sep 3rd
via web
in reply to bjkeefe
-
“Somehow I always thought we’d get more done before we became completely corrupt”
2:22 AM Sep 3rd
via web
-
@ Thanks for linking! You all should get your own old, busted bomb and circle Newt Gingrich's house, for laffs.
7:57 PM Sep 2nd
via web
in reply to Park51
-
@ this is the twitter account where the high school girls hang out, correct?
10:46 PM Sep 1st
via web
in reply to stuef
-
@ is President of Message Discipline:
1:37 PM Sep 1st
via web
-
@ The news has never been more exciting!
10:37 AM Aug 30th
via web
in reply to AdamWeinsteinMJ
-
AND IT'S WALNUTS IN A WASH
8:32 PM Aug 24th
via web
-
Crossing my fingers for Ben Quayle, the man from Hope
8:07 PM Aug 24th
via web
-
@ Right, that's stupid. "Support/Oppose" has always been misleading. It's "Couldn't begin to care/FREAK THE FUCK OUT about"
8:16 PM Aug 14th
via web
in reply to nycsouthpaw
-
@ Good. Because earlier? "For public officials, the First Amendment is the relevant issue and the only issue." Can I go now?
8:12 PM Aug 14th
via web
in reply to nycsouthpaw
-
@ Yep, those are defenses for the stance that Corboba isn't insensitive or unwise. You'd have to take that stance first, though.
7:44 PM Aug 14th
via web
in reply to nycsouthpaw
-
@ All of NYC is terrible, of course. I just hope Obama has a good response to, Is there a *reason* to be offended by this?
7:25 PM Aug 14th
via web
in reply to nycsouthpaw
-
@ Khammer I misread. His argument is irrelevant by weeks, though, since the zoning board attempt already failed.
7:05 PM Aug 14th
via web
in reply to nycsouthpaw
-
@ PamG said it's not about religious freedoms; she thinks TERRORISM is why they want to build there instead of elsewhere.
6:59 PM Aug 14th
via web
in reply to nycsouthpaw
-
@ One should be able to say, No, there is nothing offensive about one city location being blocks from another city location.
6:45 PM Aug 14th
via web
in reply to nycsouthpaw
-
@ Yup! Check out palin, kristol, nat'l review, krauthammer, lieberman, ADL even PAM GELLER said this yesterday.
6:36 PM Aug 14th
via web
in reply to nycsouthpaw
-
@ No. GOP critics *agree* (mostly) that they have equal rights. Their dangerous BS is, "muslims near WTC site?? offensive! Move!"
6:16 PM Aug 14th
via web
in reply to nycsouthpaw
-
@ anyway, he won't have much to defend himself with when GOP says, "since you brought it up, what about the relevant question?"
6:00 PM Aug 14th
via web
in reply to nycsouthpaw
|
- Name Jim Newell
- Location Washington D.C.
- Web http://www.gawker...
- Bio I was a journalism major in college, so I have every reason to believe my research is accurate.
|